In the article 'Culture Is Destiny' (Foreign Affairs, 73(2), 1994) Lee kuan Yew discusses ideas about Singapore and the importance of 'culture' to its people. Lee suggests the implementation of a Western styled democracy inapplicable to Asian societies due to cultural differences. I will discuss the adoption of 'cultural nationalism' and 'Asian values' and its use by elites in Singapore to justify the current regime's stance against democracy. I will argue the implementation of a Western styled democratic political nation state can still accommodate cultural issues Lee suggests are unworkable.
             East Asian society has been under pressure to apply democratic systems of government due to globalisation. In the case of Singapore, Lee Kuan Yew selectively
             adopted the idea of a 'Western' free market economy and as a result ,has had great economic success (Dae Jung 1994, p. 118). This occurred while elites such as Lee Quan Yew, held tight political control over the country Zakaria argues that:
             'Singapore's government can best be described as a "soft' authoritarian regime' (Zakaria 1994, p. 99).
             Lee Quan Yew achieved this through 'cultural nationalism' and more specifically the idea of 'Asian values' and Confucianism. In the case of Singapore Dae Jung argues that the concept of 'Asian Values' is used by leaders such as Lee Quan Yew as a mechanism in which to create stability and support for the elites:
             'Moreover Lee's view of culture is not only unsupportable but self serving'
             Lee Quan Yew makes further use of 'cultural nationalism and 'Asian values' through Confucianism in an attempt to support his view that Western democracy cannot work in Asia. In particular the Xiushen qijia zhiguo pingtianxia. This is an attempt to explain the current regimes stanc
             ...