As November approaches each year, political parties begin to
intensify their campaigning. Some candidates have been making campaign
efforts for years prior to an election, some, it would seem, a lifetime.
All political parties urge their constituents to get out there and vote on
election day, yet it appears these parties select candidates who really
aren't the most desirable prospects to begin with, disheartening some of
the most loyal party affiliates, and driving them away from the polls.
There are three possible answers to this troubling paradox.
The first scenario is one that is the simplest; there simply are no
truly attractive candidates out there. It is absolutely possible that the
role of politician only attracts a certain "type" of people, and that they
are not the most desirable of the human race. Politics is a dirty business
where deals are made, and promises are broken, the more upstanding citizens
may simply not wish to sully themselves with this type of sordid business.
Add to this the human nature factor, and that no one has a sparkly clean
past or future, and it could easily be the reason why quality candidates
The second scenario may be the most likely that those chosen by their
respective parties to run are not the best, but the most influential and
the most powerful. Campaigns cost a lot of money, even small town
political campaigns can be more than the average person can afford. An
influential businessperson may also have better contacts that are more able
to donate money to offset campaigning costs. In the end, the best person
for a political position may simply not have the means and the contacts to
get elected, whereas those with more resources are more likely to win an
The third scenario is the least likely of the three and involves a
conspiracy of the major political parties. In this third and quite
...