The mayor of Profligate is correct in thinking that raising the taxes
might exacerbate the city's financial problems, not to mention create new
problems, as well. For one thing, the mayor cannot know that the city will
make the same amount of money based on previous revenues. Secondly, the
mayor knows if taxes go up, consumers are likely to spend less. An
increase in sales tax could also result in residents moving out of the
city, which would be negative for every segment of the community.
For instance, a tax increase would not only burden retail owners and
purchasers; it could also cause some retail workers their jobs. Any state
tax increase will make an impact on the profits of retailers. Some
individuals might lose their jobs and, even worse, retailers operating on
marginal profits may be forced to close their businesses. If retailers
aren't forced to close, they may still have to lay workers off. These
unemployed people are generally people who desperately need jobs just to be
able to eat. In addition, those who are laid off tend to spend less money
because they have less money. This, in essence, only makes the situation
worse. Some argue that raising the sales tax widens the gap between the
low and high income. (Schmidt 636) Clearly, raising taxes should be
The mayor of Profligate also knows that an additional 7% on top of the
taxes that the people are already paying may be too much. He also knows
that just because the people voted for it, that does not mean that every
single person in the community is in favor of a tax increase. Unbearable
taxes result in unhappy voters. Generally, city and state officials who
raise taxes are not reelected. In addition, states are limited to how much
they can tax. Because of this reason, people and businesses have been
known move to a state with less a lower tax rate if their current taxes
...