In the article "Making Ends Meet-How Single Mothers Survive Welfare
and Low-Wage Work" by Christopher Jencks, both sides of the welfare for
working mothers issue are addressed. From the effects of new government
policies, to issues of childcare and health expenses, as well as a look
into the future consequences of changes that may affect the current
programs, the article looks closely at the economic hardships of single
mothers in the world today (Jencks, 199.
Jencks discussion begins with an explanation of why low-income
statistics are generally incorrect, and his explanation makes sense to me.
According to Edin and Lein (1997), the Census information collected only
relates to wages earned, and does not take into account the added costs of
employment, such as daycare and transportation. To me, we could improve in
this area. If the Census information can be drawn for wages earned, there
should be corresponding data to show the total net earnings of individuals.
In this way, we could better see a representation of the poor.
Jencks also discusses the inabilities of single mothers to live on
their federally supplied monthly income. According to the article, families
with incomes below $5,000 a year somehow also spent $1,100 a month. This
is because these women also take non-reportable work and rely on family,
friends and the fathers of their children to help support their family
(Jencks, 1997). While many may see this as taking advantage of the system,
I see it as a necessity. If the federal government is providing so little
income to these mothers, they absolutely have to find other sources of
income, in order to obtain necessities. In addition, I feel that this is
one way that mothers consider themselves responsible for providing family
Jencks also points out the flaws of a new program called "Temporary
Assistance for Needy Families" (TANF) that replaces...