Eric Schlosser's 1994 article "Reefer Madness" outlines the history
and ideology behind marijuana criminalization laws. The author attempts to
point out the flaws in America's anti-drug policies by criticizing heavy-
handed sentencing and the lack of scientific evidence against the dangers
of marijuana use. Tracing the origins of marijuana cultivation in the
United States, Schlosser shows that pot was not always the "evil weed" that
many assume it is; it was once used in an innocuous manner by the Founding
Fathers as a sturdy fiber and even as legal tender. What began the campaign
against cannabis sativa was actually rooted in racism and class
discrimination, according to Schlosser. Citing evidence that Mexican
migrant farm laborers, black New Orleans jazz musicians, and underground
groups used marijuana recreationally, the author connects anti-marijuana
laws to the era of the Great Depression. Consequently, drug laws began
politically charged and remain so until this day. Ronald Reagan's "War on
Drugs" further exacerbated the problem of overcrowding prisons with
nonviolent drug offenders, many of whom receive stricter sentences than
murderers or rapists. The purpose of Schlosser's article is to point out
the problems inherent in America's strict drug laws. The article is divided
into seven main sections. The first is a comprehensive introduction and the
remaining six deal with specific historical and geographical issues
relevant to the discussion of the topic.
The introductory section of "Reefer madness" grabs the reader's
attention though the story of Mark Young, who was sentenced to life in
prison without parole for being a "middleman." Young was not found in
possession of the plant; he simply acted as a go-between for the seller and
the buyer. Schlosser wonders how a society comes to slap stiffer sentences
on a man such as Young while those who commit violent crimes face far more
lenient penal...