The Enron scandal made news around the world and shocked many who used to
believe that corporate heads could be trusted. While the Enron scandal was
sensational it was not the first instance of corporate crime nor was it the
last. For many years corporate crime has been considered a lesser offense
than other crimes. It has been tagged white collar crime for several
generations and the prisons which hold the rarely prosecuted offenders are
more like country clubs than prisons. In more recent years, given the
magnitude and far reaching affects of scandals like Enron the American
public has demanded accountability, not only on the part of those who
commit the crime but from those who make the decision whether or not to
prosecute those involved. Given the current economic climate in the nation
concern has grown regarding corporate crime. If Americans are going to see
a reduction in crime at the corporate level, it will have to support
criminal prosecution as the most common weapon against it.
For the past several years the government has gotten more involved in
President Bush has gone public with the belief that corporate criminals
need to be sent to jail. In several speeches to America Bush has reminded
laymen that every time a large scandal is uncovered it has a negative
impact on the economy and in these struggling times Americans do not need
avoidable negative elements within the system. According to Bush movers and
shakers in the corporate world who knowingly falsify financial records of
their company belong in prison(Gordon, 2002).
Putting his money where his mouth is Bush has appointed a house committee
to examine some of the more recent scandals, and one of those examinations
resulted in subpoenas compelling testimony by top WorldCom officials in the
"Bush made the remarks in a photo session with Russian President Vla
...