A 1999 article by James L. Pirkle and John T. Bernert entitled
"Evaluation of Four Maternal Smoking Questions" used a survey method for
research. The purpose of this paper is to examine this survey instrument
with regards to its validity and reliability, as well as its
appropriateness for the task at hand. The data collection method the
authors used and the levels of data measurement for variables will also be
discussed in order to fully understand the research that was done and
whether it was completed in such a way as to be statistically significant
Analysis of the survey instrument would indicate that it is valid and
reliable. There is always some question as to reliability in any given
survey instrument, simply because there is no way to guarantee that the
people answering the questions are telling the truth. Because of this, the
final data could be affected, but the likelihood is that the lies told on
the survey, if any, are of a small enough number not to be statistically
As for the validity, the survey asks four questions, and all of them
are important when drawing conclusions as to the number of pregnant women
who smoke. The questions include whether the pregnant survey participant
smokes and how many cigarettes per day, as well as how much she has smoked
for each trimester of her pregnancy. The other two questions relate to
whether the participant smoked before becoming pregnant and whether they
stopped or cut down when they found out about the pregnancy, and how many
cigarettes they smoked (on average) during each specific month of pregnancy
(Pirkle & Bernert, 1999). Questions 2 and 4 seem to be almost identical in
scope, but nevertheless are different enough as to be important.
After the surveys were completed, researchers then evaluated the
results to see if smoking behavior went down when women found out that they
...