Traditional teaching in the United States - as in other developed,
industrialized nations - has been based on a hierarchical model in which
a teacher has all of the authority in the classroom and in which students
learn through rote drills and memorization of the facts that the teacher
presents to them. However, while some types of knowledge are best
conveyed in this traditional fashion (such as irregular verb formations
and mathematical formulae), for most other types of knowledge an non-
traditional form of learning is both more enjoyable and more productive.
This is certainly true of the ways in which nurses should be educated:
Some facts must simply be memorized but most of nursing education must be
conducted through a more active, engaged approach to learning
There are many different forms of non-traditional - i.e. non-
hierarchical - teaching and learning. Perhaps the most important (and one
that has certainly won wide-spread acceptance in many universities today)
is Constructivist teaching. Constructivism is based on the idea that
learning is as natural to humans as breathing air. We can't help doing
it, especially when we are children. Our desire to find out how the world
works is deeply programmed into our brains, encouraged over the
generations by evolutionary selection. But while learning is natural,
Eble (1993) reminds us that teaching is not and much of the goal of
constructivism is an attempt to create the best possible match between
the natural desire for children to learn (and their inherent skill at
doing so) and the artificiality of the classroom environment.
Brookfield and Preskill (1999) argue that the standard way in which
nursing education has been performed - the lecture - is one of the least
useful methods of conveying the needed knowledge and especially the
needed s...