An argument against the use of standardized tests
Standardized are used extensively in the education system throughout
the United States. These tests are being used to evaluate the academic
performance of students, the proficiency of teachers, and the effectiveness
of schools. The results of these tests indicate tracking, grade promotion,
and intellectual levels of individual students, as well as how worthy
certain schools are of receiving funding from the government. Looming
standardized tests dominate classroom instruction time, and therefore
pushed subjects deemed "unnecessary", such as physical education, art, and
music, to the back burner, while teachers focus on tedious exercises and
drills that may only serve to provide decent test scores, but nothing much
else. Overall, standardized tests create an environment of inequality in
our schools, in which students who know how to respond well on tests excel,
while other students, who may be equally as creative, knowledgeable, and
sharp, do poorly because they haven't refined their test taking skills.
Categorizing and labelling students based on scores from standardized tests
is a dangerous practice, which could have far-reaching and long lasting
The widespread use of high-stakes standardized testing seen from
coast to coast in the United States do not seem to benefit anyone in the
equation. Rayburn (2003) reported of a study conducted by the National
Research council that investigated the use of standardized test scores for
high-stake purposes, which included promotion, class placement, and
graduation. Many people do consider these tests and effective tool for
monitoring and shaping up public schools. The study found that
standardized testing can yield some valuable information, but the results
of these tests are often misunderstood and used improperly.
According to the study, test scores are su...