The incidents of April 20, 1999 from Columbine High School in Littleton,
Colorado put the consequences of student privacy in schools into a new
perspective. Two students, Dylan Klebold and Ryan Harris, who were, for
all intents, intelligent and well adjusted went on a killing spree. They
killed and injured several members of the school including a teacher.
(Rosenberg, 2000) Then they turned the guns on themselves. Their plans
were grandiose. After the massacre, they intended to flee the country.
Once the furor had died down, new information showed that the two students
were generally reticent, withdrawn and subjected to bullying by their
peers, especially the physically stronger students. Klebold and Harris
were emotionally and physically abused. Isolated, they developed a hatred
for their fellow students. Following this heinous incident, the usual
suspects began opining on how this could have been prevented. One of the
key points were whether their privacy ought to have been intruded by
searching their lockers for clues that might have prevented this disaster.
Many such instances make news these days. Among these: students bringing
guns to school, the infiltration of the drug culture into schools and
teenage pregnancies among middle and High school students. At the core of
all these problems is addressing the issues of any individual's privacy
versus the common good and safety of fellow students. These issues cannot
be dismissed offhand. The consequences of adopting one position over the
other might even have constitutional consequences. The fourteenth amendment
to the US Constitution protects the right of an individual to privacy. The
Fourth Amendment protects the student from illegal searches and seizures
(House.gov, 2003) This essay will address the ethical issues surroundin...