"When a health care worker makes a mistake, someone can die." Although
human beings are fallible and will always make mistakes no matter how
competent they are, the consequences of certain errors are more severe than
others and therefore should be punished accordingly. Health care workers
have the lives of human beings in their hands; they should be held
accountable for their actions even if mistakes were unintentional. Much
human error is preventable by adequate training or simple concentration;
therefore, it is not unreasonable to hold accountable health care workers
and others who are entrusted with human life. In rare cases, typographical
errors in magazines lead to disastrous consequences. For example, a
publication can unwittingly libel or slander a person and the correction
comes too late to undo the damage done. In these cases, the publication can
be made legally responsible and suffer whatever consequences that entails.
Basically, human errors should be judged in light of their
consequences. Errors that cause minor damage should not be punishable to
the same extent as those that cause major damage. The problem with this
position is the ambiguity that it naturally entails. Somehow someone must
weigh the facts and consequences. Victims of a mistake, however small, will
want to seek legal recourse. It would be unfair to tell the victim of, say,
the accidental libel or slander, that their grievances are unworthy of
punishment. Some cases will be totally clear: a health care worker who was
listening to a Walkman while administering anesthesia who goes on to kill
the patient out of negligence should suffer the full extent of the law,
whereas a publisher who spells Madonna's name wrong should not be penalized
much if at all. The problem is with subjective suffering: if a publication
misreports a fact, totally by accident, and that misreporting leads to that
person being ...