The motives behind the establishment of American relations and
intervention in the internal affairs of smaller nations have been anywhere
or anything from security, ideological, economic to psychological (Pastor
1998). The attention pattern the US shows is said to fluctuate between
obsession and disinterest, or something like a "whirlpool." In its
obsessive stage, that attention results in, or introduces, massive
security, political and/or economic programs in critical times in that
small nation or region. When the crisis is over, the preoccupation also
In the case of the Caribbean Basin, the US relations suggest a
drive to draw from its resources, uproot opposing ideologies, implant a
particular political philosophy or install an economic policy. But the US
is mainly driven by security, not out of the desire to control the region
but to keep situations from going out of control to the point of opening
itself to the control of hostile or opposing influences. If the US wants to
control a certain nation, it would imprint and leave its military presence
after a particular crisis. If it only wants to keep rivals out of a region
or nation, the US withdraws when the crisis is over, as it did in the case
of the Caribbean Basic (Pastor). The Caribbean Basin is too small and poor
to win or induce an acquisition or pose as a threat to the US. Clearly, it
only wanted to ward off powerful opponents from Europe or Asia from
establishing links with it to the point of utilizing it as a strategic base
for a future attack or trouble on the US or adjacent neighbors. So that
when that threat of penetration disappeared, US interest vanished too. This
explains why the Caribbean Basin has remained in a perpetual cycle of
What changes have occurred in the Caribbean Basic in the last 20
years of relation and intervention by the US' US foreign policy in the
region covers four period...