Ideally, political theater should be both polemical and entertaining.
It should instruct the viewer in a message that the viewer, after
learning' in the classroom of the theater, can apply to his or her own
life and society after leaving the darkened room of the auditorium.
However, political theater should not be so fixed upon its political
project that viewers do not wish to enter the theater in the first place,
for fear of being lectured to at the expense of receiving any entertainment
at all. To do so would drive people away from the communal benefits of the
theatrical experience; drive them back into the confines of their homes and
Moreover, political theater should use at least some of the
compelling aspects of drama to draw the viewer into the project' of the
piece. Even Brecht's famous alienation' effect, where characters are self-
consciously represented rather than seamlessly embodied by the actors,
makes use of the techniques of song, humor, and witty banter to create a
palatable as well as a political theatrical product. In fact, one of the
most effective things about political theater as entertainment as well as
good, ideological politics is its frequently flexible use of narrative,
setting, and characterization in theatrical spaces. By using this
flexibility to create connections between past and present, and theater and
life, the theatrical product itself is technically enriched.
For instance, Suzan Lori Parks "Venus" technically takes place in
London in the early 19th century. The focus of the production is the
"Venus Hottentot" who was exhibited in a circus. A court, however, was
called to determine if this exhibition of a living African artifact was in
fact slavery. Parks' play is not a detailed replication of the period, as
a film might be of the incident. Rather, it is a truly epic play in the
fullest Brechtian sense of the term, whe...