In their Oct 2003 article, Can free entry be inefficient' Fixed commissions
and social waste in the real estate industry Chang-Tai Hsieh, Enrico
Moretti (2003) argue against removal of entry barriers in real estate
industry as they notice inefficiency prevailing in the cities where number
of real estate agents in relatively higher. In other words, they argue
against the commonly held belief that there should be no barriers to entry.
The author maintain that even though barriers to entry sound like a scary
term to most economists, it must be borne in mind that free entry or
relatively easy entry into any industry can lead to inefficiency and loss
of productivity. This is most pronounced in the case of real estate
industry where presence of higher number of real estate agents almost
always leads to inefficient distribution of income. To understand this
problem, we must first take into account the definition of economics or
what is the real purpose of this science. Lionel Robbins gave us the most
famous definition of economics when he said that, "Economics is the science
which studies human behavior as a relationship between ends and scarce
means that have alternative uses" (quoted in Stigler (1984, 301) This means
economics is all about distribution of resources in such a manner that
Entry to barriers are mostly erected to maximize profits and to maintain
certain monopoly over prices and supply of goods and services. For this
reason, entry barriers are viewed in a negative light and most economic
gurus would argue against their existence, it is generally believed that
while barriers to entry kills competition and leads to high prices. The
control normally remains in the hands of few key players whop dictate the
terms in the industry. However if we study the impact of too many players
in a market due to lack of these barriers, we notice that non-existence of
...