1. In this particular case, it is not simply enough for the factory owner
to state that he cannot afford to operate an economically sound
factory. It is not only his economic future, or indeed his legal
future, that is at stakeâ€"it is also the rights of the individuals
whose lives may be affected by his environmentally and economically
irresponsible behavior. Furthermore, clean water is a scarce
resource. Unlike sunlight, it is not naturally renewable. By
tainting this resource, the individual impedes the economic
development of others. For instance, if I cannot go to work because I
am sickened by the pollution from the factory, my own economic health
One useful economic model to deploy when examining the irresponsible
behavior of the factory owner might be to posit the Classical model of
economics, as suggested by Adam Smith, which in fact does not propose an
entirely hands off' relationship between government and industry. For
instance, if a monopoly develops, the government, in this economic model,
the government free to step in and break down the monopoly, to recreate a
free economy where competitors can generate a healthy economic stasis of
supply and demand. Here, the government must step in and assert that a
healthy environment must be created for the general welfare as well as
the economic stasis of all afflicted members of the community who are not
privy to access to other sources of clean water.
2. Allocating the property rights to those who use the river as their
primary source of clean water would generate an allocatively effective
outcome because those individuals would have a personal and economic
interest in keeping the water clean. At present, the current
possessor of the rights to the water does not have such self-in
...