Seeing is believing, or so the old adage would have us believe.
While a person cannot be sure of those things which he is told, or that
which he reads, seeing - ah, that is the proof of reality. However, this
id not the case for Percy or Berger. These two existential leaning critics
challenge the reader to ask the question "what is reality" and to ponder
whether or not what a person sees is a true identification of reality.
In Percy's "The Loss of Creature" the author devotes his effort to
questioning whether or not seeing is really believing. Through an
elaborate comparison of many different settings, Percy arrives at an
elusive and unfulfilling conclusion. He starts with the example of a
visitors' experience of the Grand Canyon. Does the modern tourist have the
same experience as Garcia Lopez de Cardenas who discovered the majestic
land form' Percy builds an elaborate argument that the modern tourist,
because his perspective may have been performs by travel brochures, or post
cards could not possibly have the same experience as the first explorer who
stumbled upon the Grand Canyon after traveling through miles and miles of
desert. Cardenas experience, and therefore the reality of the canyon, is
different, says Percy. The modern explorer cannot possibly experience the
beauty and majesty of the Canyon in the same way Cardenas did.
According to Percy, this transformation of experience has created a
transformation of, and the loss of the human creature. Because we live in a
modern, digital world which brings together the unknowns into a
homogeneous, digital experience, we have lost something of ourselves. Percy
seems to say that only being able to experience something for the first
time, without any preconception or bias, is a definition of continuing to
live as a human creature. Regarding the Grand Canyon, he asks how the
Grand Canyon can be recovered by the...