Affirmative action policies were first enacted in 1965 with the best
of intentions -- to level the playing field for women and minority ethnic
and racial groups. These policies have helped many people pursue higher
education and as a result, secure better employment opportunities.
However, in recent years, these same policies have given rise to charges of
reverse discrimination, particularly in regard to university admission
policies.
This paper argues for the continued need for affirmative action
policies that give more consideration to the special circumstances of
racial and ethnic minorities. This position is based on three main
arguments. First, race and socio-economic class continue to play a large
role in the academic performance of many minority students. Second,
critics of race-based affirmative action fail to address the related issue
of "developmental" admissions, which give preference to children from
wealthy or alumni families.
Finally, this paper points out that by increasing diversity on
campuses, affirmative action in schools can have a long-term positive
effect on American society as a whole. Because of these mitigating
circumstances, this paper argues for the continued need for universities to
use race and ethnicity as a circumstance in considering candidates for
admission.
Effects of socio-economic class
In their book The Shape of the River, former Princeton University
president William Bowen and former Harvard University president Derek Bok
argue for the necessity of goal-based affirmative action policies in
colleges and universities. According to them, "if universities were flatly
prohibited from considering race in admissionsâ€over half the black students
in selective colleges today would have been rejected."[1]
Critics often interpret this statement as evidence of affirmative
action's disregard for individual merit. Affirmative actio...