Few people would think to compare marriage to the military. However,
being experienced with both, I realize that the two institutions have more
in common than they seem to. For example, both involve a great degree of
commitment, symbolized by a contract and manifested in a daily reminder of
one's selfless duties. Moreover, both marriage and the military involve a
sort of basic training, in which new bonds of family and friendship are
forged and new habits learned. As I reflected on my two marriages and my
military service, the similarities between the two became even clearer. Of
course, the differences between marriage and military life are obvious: the
former involves none of the weaponry and battle tactics of the latter, at
least we hope. Furthermore, marriage is supposed to be much more
egalitarian than military social structures, even though this often is not
the case. Regardless of the glaring differences between marriage and
military life, both are social, political, and economic institutions that
When one enters the military, he or she takes an oath and signs a
contract. Similarly, marriage involves a contractual agreement as well.
These contracts are legally binding but they are also highly symbolic. In
both cases, the contract means commitment. When I signed my marriage
license, I promised to spend my life with that person. Marriage contracts
normally don't have expiration dates. However, military contracts are
usually drafted with a certain time limit expressly stated. For instance, I
committed to being in the reserves for a certain number of years. On the
other hand, a marriage contract is supposed to be permanent: "Till death to
us part." Unfortunately, about half of all marriages in North America,
including my first marriage, end in divorce. With both the military and
wedlock, breach of contract can be a huge hassle with unforeseen and
...