Langdon Winner calls technological determinism "nave," because the
viewpoint fails to take into consideration the impact of social and
political forces on the shaping of technological systems in society (63).
Technology has no will of its own; it would be impossible to separate the
psychological, sociological, political, and economic influences on the
inventor or engineer from the products that he or she creates. For example,
an architect builds buildings according to the needs of the client and in
accordance with the building codes and environmental laws of the community.
Moreover, the architect brings his or her own aesthetic sensibility to the
design project, which in turn impacts the overall atmosphere and feel of
the surrounding area. The type of design the architect chooses is equally
as informed by culture: a Chinese pagoda would probably not be built among
a row of track housing in a Detroit suburb, for example. Furthermore, the
architect works within the budgetary parameters of his client and within a
specific time frame, both of which imply the economic factors that impact
the shaping of technology. Related to these economic influences on
technology is also the availability of certain building materials. The
design of the building will depend partly on the materials used in its
construction, which in turn are chosen for specific economic, social, and
political reasons. For instance, a "green home" would use recycled
materials, whereas a suburban track housing development would employ the
cheapest materials possible. With this example of architecture, it is easy
to see how the social shaping of technology is a more plausible framework
for analyzing the relationship between technology and society than the
Technological determinism seeks simplicity: technology exists for its
own sake. Human minds and hands might mold technology from a practical
...