In an increasingly pluralistic society, "we need to think ourselves beyond
the nation," (158). Traditional concepts of the nation-state focus on land
and clearly defined geo-political borders, common languages, common
histories, blood ties, and cultural traditions. However, that which
previously united a people under a rubric called "nation" no longer
applies, as territory itself is less important to the definition of a
"nation" than a shared identity forged through what AUTHOR identifies as
diasporas. Mass migrations of people across geo-political boundaries has
created nations-within-nations, minority ethnic, religious, or racial
groups that unite first under their bond and second under the laws and
customs of their newly adopted nation-state. AUTHOR calls these subcultures
"trans-nations," pointing to the requisite hyphen that attends so many
transnational identities in the United States. African-Americans, Hispanic-
Americans, and Asian-Americans comprise some of the dislocated,
decentralized nations that help form fresh insight into the concept of
nation and of nationalism. Moreover, transnationalism impacts traditional
patriotic sentiments, sometimes by undermining it and other times by simply
augmenting the need for newly forged social forms. For example, an Italian-
American may feel compelled to join the United States army as a display of
loyalty for his newly adopted nation-state.
However, AUTHOR distinguishes between allegiance to one's culturally
or racially-defined nation and being willing to die for one's country.
Traditional patriotism is defined as the latter, while new post-national
patriotism is defined by the former. AUTHOR states on page 173, "diasporic
diversity actually puts loyalty to a nonterritorial transnation first," and
loyalty to one's territorially-defined nation-state second. Not all
individual members of transnations arrange their allegiances in...