The primary difference between the early Russian films of the first
half of the 20th century, and those films that exemplify the artistic ethos
of the German Expressionist movement is that of the significance given to
narrative and to expressing a singular and coherent ideology for the
viewer. While Eisenstein's "Battleship Potemkin" has a clear narrative and
ideological gloss, German Expressionistic films such as "The Cabinet of Dr.
Caligari" encourage viewers to accompany the director through a series of
images that take him or her on an internal, expressive journey within him
or herself, creating subjective associations within the unconscious that
The way this effect is accomplished is through, in the case of Russian
filmmakers such as Eisenstein, through what is termed an "associative
process" of narrative interaction with the audience. In other words, the
narrative and descriptive sequences of the film are manipulated over the
course of the film to invest particular images and aspects of the film with
great importance. The viewer remembers these images as important narrative
markers, and also invests such images with an associative ideological
context within the significance of the film. However these markers possess
a relatively limited frame of significance in the sense that a viewer is
not allowed carte blanche to assign meaning to these images, based purely
on personal associations. Rather, the viewer is overwhelmed with copious
quantities of shapes, objects, and lines, but all of a similar nature, thus
giving meaning to and emphasizing an audience's response.
For instance, in "Battleship Potemkin," the audience's experience of
different members of the crew washing dishes, and cleaning the ship, all
with circular motions, give a sense of continual, labored business. If the
audience does not comprehend the busy quality of the ship, the implications
...