The article by Hilda Rosselli and Judith Irvin, entitled, "Differing
Perspectives, Common Ground: The Middle School and Gifted Education
Relationship" discusses the issue of the middle school as a conducive
environment and venue for the education of gifted children. In describing
this issue and phenomenon, the authors confront the current state of
education among gifted children, as asserted by "leaders in gifted
education," who stated that inappropriateness of the middle school setting
in educating gifted children. According to the article, "when middle
grades philosophy positioned heterogeneous grouping as one of the
preeminent guideposts for policies and practices endorsed by the field, the
common ground between the two fields lessened" (35). This statement shows
the necessity for a distinction between gifted and ordinary' middle school
students, primarily because the former is considered as possessing
extraordinary talents and intelligence than the latter.
Rosselli and Irvin argue otherwise. While considering the argument
presented by the leaders in gifted education, both authors argue that
gifted children have the potential and ability to cope in middle
schoolâ€"that is, be educated under the standard form of education and within
a normal social environment. Offering both the pros and cons of education
of gifted children in middle schools, the authors discuss the different
perspectives that centers on the relationship that middle school has with
gifted education, and vice versa. Using meta-analysis as the primary
research method to analyze the literature and trends recurring on the said
issue, Rosselli and Irvin posit that through "instructional grouping,"
problems encountered in studying the effects of middle school environment
on gifted children can be minimized, hence making the middle school an
appropriate venue for gifted children's intelle...