Many social analysts have argued that Christianity and the Bible lend
themselves to diverse and often conflicting interpretations. This view is
borne out in the case of race. Preachers of racial tolerance and those who
advocate racial extremism have cited the Bible as a source of their beliefs
This paper compares and contrasts the racial views of two very
different leaders, namely Dr. Martin Luther King and David Duke of the
modern Ku Klux Klan. It focuses on the religious and biblical
underpinnings that both leaders have used to justify their teachings
The first part of this paper examines the relationship between race
and religion, as articulated by David Duke. This section looks at how Duke
articulates his racist beliefs through a series of biblical
misinterpretations. As a result, Duke argues for a God who privileges the
Caucasian race over the rest of creation. He also argues for a separation
of the races, one that is mandated by the Bible. In addition to discussing
Duke's views, this section also looks at how his teachings have influenced
the views of his followers regarding racial matters.
The second part then looks Dr. Martin Luther King's teachings
regarding race, messages that are rooted in a strong underpinning of
Christianity. This section highlights the striking differences between
Duke's interpretation of the Bible and that of King. In contrast to Duke's
segregationist message, King preached a Bible that saw an inclusive, God-
given creation. This means that all people, regardless of race, are seen
as worthy people, created in the image of the Lord.
In the conclusion, this paper argues that King's views on race
relations better articulates the Bible's teachings regarding love and
brotherhood. Duke's preachings, on the other hand, is already colored by
his own biases. As a result, Duke presents a skewed version of the Bible,
...