One of the most comprehensive studies conducted on the effectiveness
of online education indicated that cyberlearners performed significantly
better than those in classrooms (Navarro 1999). The study compared two
groups, consisting of 200 undergraduates at the University of California,
enrolled in the Introductory Macroeconomics course: one in the traditional
classroom, and the other, through cyber learning, with the use of a set of
multimedia CD-ROM lectures. The cyber group was also given many electronic
equipment tools, including an electronic bulletin board linked to a
discussion room, with access to an electronic testing center, which was a
At the end of the course, both groups were subjected to a common
exam, wherein the cyber learners scored 15% higher than the traditional
learners, regardless of gender, ethnicity, academic background, computer
background or academic aptitude (Navarro). This finding came in the midst
of criticisms hurled at online education from traditional classroom
teachers. Political pressure has also been vented against a virtual
university that deterred its expansion plans. Despite this, online
educators believe that online learning has very bright prospects if courses
are designed well and if the approach includes multimedia lectures,
interactive communication opportunities and electronic testing (Navarro).
While it is acknowledged that cyber courses are too many and only present a
sort of digitized textbooks, some subjects appear to be far more suitable
for learning online than in the traditional method. These are courses
taught in large classes in large lecture halls but scanty interaction with
the professor or lecturer, such as economics, mathematics, chemistry and
Training at work is also evolving as the nature and body of work
become more refined, employees must receive a minimum of 40 hours of
training a year and that functions mus...