The courthouse itself was abuzz on a Monday morning. Just about every
courtroom was filled, some with trials for petty traffic violations, some
with murder trials. The courtroom I selected for observation had a small
group of people milling about outside, most of them men and women in
business suits. Obviously there to witness the trial, I also believed that
a few of the people standing outside the room were slated to be witnesses
in the case. Usinger -v- Bartholemew Roofing was a criminal negligence suit
filed by a man who claimed that the roofing company he hired had
deliberately used substandard materials and performed shoddy work. A
section of the Usinger home had been destroyed because the roof suddenly
caved in over the dining room. Luckily, no one was injured. This was the
A few minutes before 9 o'clock, most of the people outside the
courtroom meandered inside to take their seats. The courtroom seated about
two hundred people in addition to the courtroom officials. I sat in the
second-to-last row, next to a man who told me he had just enrolled in law
school. After introducing myself as a fellow observer, I realized the trial
was about to begin and took out my notebook. One of the first things I
noticed was that the atmosphere was somewhat similar to television
courtrooms but that setting seemed more relaxed somehow and quieter. I was
surprised how many visitors and observers there were, and was equally taken
aback by the relative informality of the interactions between judge and
attorney. The judge spoke in a fairly subdued voice, and only one of the
lawyers spoke loudly, directing his attention to the jury as if he were an
actor. The jury I noticed consisted of a heterogeneous group of men and
women, several of whom were minorities.
The defendants, including a representative from Bartholemew Roofing
and the two contractors who completed the bulk of the work at t...