Many classic accounts regarding "man against nature" adventures liken
these adventures to conquest. A mountain, for example, is a force to be
mastered or conquered. Reaching the summit is akin to a victory over the
mountain. People who forge trails into the wilderness refer to "taming"
the wilds. Through these terms, nature is presented as entirely subject
to human will, as targets to be assaulted and subdued.
For Jon Krakauer, however, nature is itself is possesses an archetypal
power. Whether mountains or wilderness, Krakauer writes of nature with an
imbued collective and spiritual energy. These places are physical
reminders of a transcendent world to which most humans aspire.
This paper examines Krakauer's portrayal of nature in Into the Wild
and Into Thin Air. The first part of this paper compares how the author
portrays nature as spiritual forces that attract seekers, not conquerors.
The second part of the paper focuses on how nature asserts its own
dominance in the face of human arrogance and human error. In the
conclusion, the paper emphasizes Krakauer's argument, that nature is a
force, from which people could seek solace or strength. However, when
arrogance, incompetence or bad luck come into play, then the same nature
that nurtures the soul could just as easily spawn tragedy.
In Into the Wild, Krakauer tells the story of Chris McCandless,
speculating on why the wealthy young college graduate and devotee of Leo
Tolstoy, Jack London and Henry David Thoreau left his promising life to go
into forbidding Alaskan territory. For Krakauer, McCandless is not an
anti-social misfit. Instead, the young vagabond is guided by an earnest
asceticism, one that is impossible to sustain in the crowded modern world,
which is replete with distractions. To mirror his inner journey,
McCandless "yearned to find a blank spot on the map." The closest spot he
...