The term "euthanasia" conjures up thoughts of the family pet having a
dignified death, but it is not the same when it comes to loved ones and
family members. While it may be accepted practice to end the suffering of
an animal that cannot express its' wishes, it is not accepted practice to
murder a suffering loved one, and that is what euthanasia, or physician-
assisted suicide comes to - murder. There are two types of euthanasia in
question in this debate, passive and active. Passive euthanasia is the act
of allowing someone who is terminally ill to die, without intervening with
medication or treatment to continue his or her life. Today, passive
euthanasia is a reasonably common event in the United States. Families
inform the doctor their loved one does not wish to continue on life support
if there is no hope of recovery, or does not wish to suffer incessantly,
and doctors remove all care and simply manage the pain of the patient until
they pass away. This is the role of a physician, to manage the treatment
of the patient, not to manage their murder.
Active euthanasia, or physician-assisted suicide, is another matter.
This is a form of murder, traceable back to the family and the physician.
In this practice, a terminally ill patient actually takes their own life,
sometimes on their own, and sometimes with the assistance of a physician.
The well known "Dr. Death," Dr. Kevorkian, is a participant in and advocate
of active euthanasia. However, physicians are supposed to be in the
business of healing, not murder, and it goes against everything a physician
has trained for to take part in physician-assisted suicide. It is
ethically and morally reprehensible for a physician to take the life of his
As with most contentious issues, there are great moral and ethical
issues surrounding physician-assisted suicide. While it is hotly debated
across the country, the issue ...