Americans have just witnessed what may stand in historical perspective
as the onset of a new era. That is, the terrorist bombing of the World
Trade Center on September 11th. The World Wars represented for most people
the depth of carnage, brutality and government excess that is possible when
the moral foundation of society is lost to the acquisition of power. The
twentieth century brought with it a new awakening to multiculturalism as
technology enabled the conceptualization of a 'global community'. The
twenty- first century may well prove an era of change in power, especially
in the sense of the United States as sole superpower'.
Richard Ned Lebow has said, "Power is defined as capability relative
to other states" (1994, p. 249). The collapse of the Soviet Union is said
to have been the deciding factor in America' ascension to sole superpower'
status. The problem with being at the head of the pack' is that a balance
must be maintained between the use of such power for responsible leadership
and the misuse in the interests of exploitation and, or, expansion
(Lipsett, 1998). Balance is also the key word in considering the military
buildup as opposed to the economic consequences of military spending.
There are many who would side with the "declinist theories that posited an
exhausted America, the geoeconomic assumption that military power was
passé, and the chaos' theorists who saw America as incapable of dealing
with the real problems that would define the next age of history, including
proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, local famines and genocide,
pollution, and resource depletion" (Harkavy, 1997, p. 578). It is thought
that the United States' continued role as a superpower will be based on the
political conduct as well as world opinion as to the abuse of such power
The future of America's power status is dependent on "American power
and p...