Substantial research has been conducted proving that occupational
segregation and wage discrimination still exist in today's society.
Despite recent gains by women and minorities in the field of employment,
other factors aside (such as skills, qualifications and education) women
and minorities still fall behind men when considering pay and occupational
choices. The consequences of such actions are that women are often
concentrated in clerical and service jobs which overall result in less pay
and opportunities for advancement. Blau, Ferber and Winkler (2001) point
out that even though an almost equivalent number of men and women work in
professional positions, men are still more likely to be concentrated in
lucrative professions including law, medicine and engineering, whereas
women are segregated into lower paying positions including teaching and
Several different theories lend credence and explanation to
occupational segregation and wage discrimination forces. Some are more
supply sided in nature while others depend more on institutionalized
practices. Human and capital theory for example suggest that women
generally anticipate "shorter and less continuous work lives than men" and
are generally paid lower at the outset, thus have lower wage penalties for
taking time off from work (Blau, Ferber and Winkler, 2001:213). The
studies that will be most closely examined in this paper include theories
along this line including neoclassical theory and theories opposing this
viewpoint including the Institutionalist or Marxist idealisms related to
NEOCLASSICAL vs. INSTITUTIONALIST/MARXIST THEORIES
Blau, Ferber and Winkler (2001) suggest that occupational or labor
discrimination occurs when "two equally qualified individuals are treated
differently solely on the bases of their gender" (p. 202; Becker, 1971).
This can occur from a variety of factors, and theorists have disc...