Robert Frost and T. S. Eliot were undoubtedly influential poets of their
time. Both poets eventually enjoyed fame and popularity for developing
their own voice and style. While both men wrote compelling poetry, we find
the aesthetic poet with Eliot and the meditative poet with Frost. Both men
clearly experienced the beauty and despair that was common to their time,
but their poetry took very different paths, and in the poets' eyes, served
different purposes. Frost is most certainly recognized as a poet coming
close to nature, often using nature as a symbol in many of his pastoral
poems. We also discover his verse to be more reflective and meditative than
that Eliot's. Additionally, there seems to be no subject too simple or
complicated for Frost. His topics cover a variety of issues from moral
dilemmas to mending fences. While his work can often feel as dark as
Eliot's does, it rarely connects itself with historical circumstances and
modern issues. In contrast, Eliot reached far beyond Frost's typical
landscape in his poetry. We also find many sources for his inspiration,
including a variety of historical periods, cultures, and religions. His
verse is generally considered difficult and usually it depicts mankind and
society in the midst of chaos and destruction. While Frost could relate to
loss and melancholy, he related to it on a more personal level.
Eliot is perhaps most popular for promoting the aesthetic experience,
which was primarily concerned with discovering a, "positive doctrine by
which to confirm his faith in the discipline of art and intellect, an
orthodoxy with which to buttress his identification of individual
experience with the imperatives of moral responsibility and historical
tradition" (Spiller 1368). Criticism coupled with values serves as a basis
for the majority of Eliot's work and has thus rendered him a dominating
While Eliot valued the ae...