Cultural awareness and the careful use of language and rhetoric have
enhanced the global war on terrorism. Language is a powerful tool that can
either act to demonize the enemy or to increase the understanding of the
enemy through cultural awareness. Cultural awareness itself is a powerful
tool in the arsenal against terrorism, as it allows for the better
understanding of the enemy, thus enhancing the effort on the global war on
Perhaps one of the most important and inherent dangers in the war on
terror is the prospect of demonizing and oversimplifying the enemy. Dan
Rather, famous anchor and managing editor of CBS News, illustrates the
danger of such an approach. In answer to David Letterman's question, "Why
do these people hate us'", Rather responded, "They're evil" (cited in
Corliss, 2001). In Rather's defense, the interview took place shortly
after the tragedy of September 11th, and he was likely overwhelmed with
shock and grief. Nonetheless, his answer does illustrate both the power of
language and a lack of cultural awareness on our understanding about the
war on terror. Traditional military terms like Charlie (describing the
Viet Cong), (Wikipedia) are also examples of the use of language to
distance us from the enemy as individuals.
Rather's sort of rhetoric is dangerous, as it serves to dehumanize
our enemies and portray them as completely evil and ourselves as entirely
righteous. Notes Fedler (2001), "When we totally dehumanize our enemies,
the terrorists, once again, have won." In doing this, those fighting the
war on terrorism are "drawn into the simplistic dualism of the terrorists
who see themselves as totally righteous and all Americans as totally evil"
Crucial in combating such dualism is the concept of cultural
awareness. Further, cultural awareness gives America the benefit of a
better understanding of the motivations and subtext
...