Financial aid for education is made available by governments,
educational institutions, and charitable trusts primarily with the
objective of helping children who come from the less advantaged sections of
society. Indeed, this is the reason why financial aid applications ask for
information on family income and assets, as such data can help determine an
individual student's financial need. The other important fact about student
financial aid is that it is funded by taxes that are paid by all citizens
on the tacit understanding that such monies will be used for the overall
good of society. Thus, the system of student financial aid has been set up
with an ethical purpose and as such, it can be argued that any attempt to
deceive the system is unethical as it defeats the envisioned end of
achieving social justice. Viewed from this perspective, I find that the
justifications offered by John's parents for lying on John's financial aid
application unacceptable. Further, the arguments put forth by John's
parents are unconvincing even when evaluated on their own independent
merit, as it raises the issue of certain basic, fundamental values such as
integrity. Therefore, in my view, John's parents' arguments are pretty thin
as they are tantamount to an ethically and morally wrong principle.
However, it must be admitted that it was not easy to reach the above
conclusions. For, although the arguments were untenable when viewed from
the stand point of objectivism or the theory that moral and ethical values
can be objective, one's sympathies were with John's parents. Take, for
instance, their argument that colleges seem to reward middle-class families
who don't save money by giving them financial aid, rather than rewarding
people who've saved all they can in order to give their children the
advantages of higher education. Such a fact hardly seems fair, and more so
when taking into consid...