The consequences of following an ideology in its purest form, even a
good ideology, would be horrific. Imagine if one followed the ideology of
pure democracy to its fullest extent. There would be no protection of
minority rights. Those who were of minority ethnic or religious groups, or
simply held opinions contrary to the majority who ruled, would be summarily
silenced or, if the majority so ruled, executed. Even the Christian
doctrine of giving all to the poor would be difficult for such a zealous
Christian's family, whom might not agree with his or her ideals. Dissent
and disagreement for the zealot are not to be tolerated, thus even good
ideologies must be espoused with a balanced eye upon the opposing side.
Ideologies are best experienced in the plural, much as the United States
embraces elements both of republican and democratic systems of belief.
Fortunately, there is no real livable pure' ideology, as ideologies
such as democracy, Christianity, feminism, and Marxism exist more as
constellations of ideas than pure and enforceable schemas of thought.
Quite often, within ideologies that have stood the test of human history
and time, there is just as much if not more debate between ideologies'
adherents than there are between those who disagree with the manifested
Today, although the idea of the welfare state,' for example, within
the United States, is considered anathema (as opposed to comparable
governments in Europe with stronger social safety nets) there are still
ways in which individuals who live in a state of want or privation are
provided for, lest they not suffer too much hunger or housing deprivation.
Although this task of the government, to make up for the excesses and
imbalances of the capitalist market, may be considered against the official
American ideology of noninterventionist government and republican self-
reliance, America's image of it...