Immigration, into the United States, both legal and illegal is one of
the most controversial issues in our society. Contrary to the popular
belief that the United States has relatively open borders there are many
restrictive laws limiting immigration and naturalization of citizens, often
race or origin specific. Though most people, in the information era are
more aware of these issues than they have been in the past, not honestly
believing in the "poor and huddles masses" of the infamous quote on the
statue of liberty there is still much common myth associated with
One of the most prevalent myths among the U.S. culture is that the
immigration laws of the United States are fair and judicial, and contain
little if any unethical foundations, such as racism. Speaking of the
possible assumptions created by revisionist history Spiro points out a
One arrives at the following syllogism: The American experience is one
of liberal democracy. The American experience is also one of
consistent exclusions based on race and gender. Therefore, liberal
democracy is inevitably intertwined with racism and gender
Though this may be an extreme view there is still some solid truth in the
sentiments of the revisionist historian and the seeker of truth associated
with the history of America and the oxymoron created by ideals that to a
large degree have never been met, and nothing can be closer to the truth
with regards to exclusion in immigration.
The immigration debates to come in industrialized countries will also
determine whether governments will, at long last, abandon the myths of
"temporariness" and enforceable rotation of workers, and take the
steps necessary to promote the sociocultural integration and economic
mobility of settled immigrants and their children -- especially those
not currently viewed as easily assimilable (Mexicans i...