While there are some physicists who believe that black holes do not
exist, there is much data to support otherwise. In fact, much evidence
seems to support the existence of black holes. For example, NASA's Hubble
Telescope and the Chandra X-ray Observatory seem to have discovered "direct
evidence' (NASA 2001) of one characteristic of a black hole. This
characteristic is the area that surrounds black holes, which emits very
little energy. Michael Garcia states, "By detecting very little energy
from these black hole candidates, we have new proof that event horizons
exist" (NASA). Furthermore, astronomers have also detected sound waves
coming from what they believe to be a black home in the Perseus galaxy
cluster. (Discovery 2003) Astronomers have long known that gravity in
black holes pulls matter toward them, with matter accelerating the closer
it comes to the black hole. Calculations also show that gas surrounding
black holes will become hotter. One of the most persuasive cases
supporting these theories is Cygnus X-1. (Pasachoff 1991 p. 496) By
studying mass, velocity, and X-rays around the star HDE 226868, astronomers
believe black holes do exist. Another case supporting the existence of
black holes is the discovery of "mid-mass black holes" (Beasley 2001) in
Meanwhile, John Cramer explains that this theory grounds itself in the
fact that with standard general relativity, "gravity is considered to be
geometrical', to be a consequence of the curvature of space produced by
nearby mass-energy" (Cramer). In short, because "Because gravitational
energy does not produce curvature, it does not respect local energy
conservation" (Cramer). Those who support this theory also maintain that
another problem with the general relativity theory concerning black holes
deals with "space-time singularities'" (Cramer). Because we cannot place
ourselves inside a black hole, we do not...