A compelling argument against using race as a consideration in college
admissions is that everyone has something different about them, if one
looks hard enough, and so anyone could claim minority status in some way.
To use individual traits of arbitrary choice does not make sense, as this
writer notes, "Individualism cannot be defined via individuating or
important traits. The principle of individualism is really meant to
capture the completely different idea that people should be judged only by
traits they choose. That is why race, an involuntary, immutable trait, is
an improper basis for judgment" (Levin, 1997, p. 338). One cannot choose
one's race, but one can choose other traits to excel at, and so, traits
that are chosen and agreed on should be used as considerations for college
admissions, such as GPAs, athletic and social abilities, membership in
extracurricular activities, and test scores. These are all attributes that
students have some input and control over, and these, not traits that
cannot be chosen and acted upon, should be used to ensure everyone gets an
equal chance at education and advancement. The weakness here is that those
students who do not choose to work on themselves may not gain admission;
while the strength is that those students who work hard will have a better
Eliminating standardized testing is also a way to eliminate race as a
basis for college admissions. Standardized tests measure nothing but
standard learning. Each individual is different, and should be evaluated
on those differences, rather than what they have in common with everyone
else. Standardized testing is also suspect as to really giving a balanced
view of actual learning. Another writer states, "The overriding conclusion
is neither new nor earthshaking: in crafting a college admissions policy,
tests serve as useful, but far from perfect, tools" (Zwick, 1999, p. 320).
...