Several theories have been advanced by political commentators around
the world about the real reasons behind the United States' war with Iraq.
These include the Bush administration's "official" version[1] about
preventing the "Weapons of Mass Destruction" (WMDs) from falling into the
terrorists' hands, the supposed connection between Saddam and Al-Qaeda,
liberation of Iraq from the clutches of a cruel tyrant, and the neo-
conservative agenda of creating a "model democracy" in Iraq for the Arab
world to follow. Although some of these reasons may be valid to an extent,
the more plausible explanation for the US war in Iraq lies in the
imperatives of globalization. This is because economics have always been
and remain the driving force behind international relations. This paper
looks at the current Iraq war from the perspective of the Globalism
International Relations theory besides reviewing the historical background
of the conflict and its possible outcomes.
Historical Background of the Conflict
Modern Iraq was created by the British colonialists out of three
Ottoman provinces after the fall of the Ottoman Empire at the end of World
War I in 1918. A pro-British monarch was installed in the country to
safeguard Western interests and to ensure that the Iraq Petroleum Company,
which enjoyed monopoly control over the Iraqi oil industry, would be
allowed to follow the cartel interests of the international Anglo-American
oil companies. A nationalist coup in 1958 overthrew the pro-British
monarch, throwing a spanner in the works by shifting the ideological
policies of the country towards left leaning nationalism which was a threat
to Western influence in Iraq. ("History of Oil in Iraq")
Saddam Hussein, the hated tyrant who was declared the enemy # 1 by the
US in later years was not always in the anti-American camp. In fact there
is evidence to suggest th...