Currently, 38 states have legalized capital punishment statutes. In
most states, the reinstatement's of the death penalty were a response to
public outcry over the perceived increase of violent crimes. There are
now more than 3,000 people on death row, and more are being convicted each
Despite this legalized status, a vocal group of opponents have raised
questions regarding the constitutionality, fairness and effectiveness of
capital punishment. This paper argues that opponents of the death penalty
are misguided, and that the death penalty is a sad but necessary tool for
The first part of the paper is an overview regarding capital
punishment in the United States. It looks at which states have legalized
the death penalty and how this punishment is imposed. It focuses
especially on Texas, the leading state in the number of executions.
The next part of the paper gives an overview of the concerns of death
penalty opponents. This includes the arguments that the death penalty is
unfairly administered to the poor and to ethnic minorities. These
arguments also include the unconstitutionality of the death penalty,
arguments for humane treatment and forgiveness and the danger of false
In the third part of this paper, the author refutes these arguments
and discusses the pros of capital punishment. It focuses on proving that
the death penalty acts as a deterrent to violent crime. It also argues
that advances in DNA technology will make false convictions a thing of the
past. If administered fairly and judiciously, this paper maintains that
capital punishment is a powerful tool for ensuring the rule of law in a
The death penalty has a long history in the United States. It was
first instituted when the early British settlers brought the practice into
the colonies. The first execution in recorded American history occurred in
1608, when George Kenda...