The first reading of Euripides' Hippolytus generates an irresistible urge
to see Hippolytus as the tragic protagonist. After all, he was the one who
suffered all his life under the stigma of being an illegitimate child and
died believing his father was a just and kind man though he was not. And on
top of that, he met a very tragic death and was accused of something he
never did. In short, Hippolytus had some major traits of a tragic hero
including the fact that the people he loved killed him for a sin he had
never committed. But on second and a much closer reading, it appears that
while Hippolytus is no doubt a tragic figure, he isn't the tragic hero
because he lacks the basic tragic flaw that actually brought on the
downfall of our major tragic protagonists in literature.
From Brutus to King Lear to Willy Loman, every tragic hero had a tragic
flaw responsible for his downfall. But Hippolytus' character had that one
flaw missing. So in many ways he was like Julius Caser who suffered
immensely when his own friend conspired against him and accused of
something that he had not done. But then Caesar was not our tragic hero; it
was Brutus who qualified for that role since he had the tragic flaw that
resulted in his tragic collapse and demise. So Hippolytus was definitely a
tragic figure but not our real tragic protagonist of the play. In fact the
actual tragic protagonist was his father Theseus who is victim of blind
passion and lacks the ability to be patient and wise.
Theseus of Euripides is probably the best version of him we get from
ancient literature. According to most other versions, Theseus was a cruel
king with tales of his philandering widely known. But in Euripides, he is
depicted as a faithful even a little cold, distant, reticent father who
suffers in the end as he loses his son to his own hastiness and flawed
judgment. His tragic flaw is his lack of patience and thus an inab...