The Constitution provided the right to free speech and this right afforded us to voice our issues, concerns, discontent or even salutations to how our government acts or does. Previously, the freedom of speech was expressed through the power of the pen or oration in different gatherings but modernization of the media changed all that. The Internet, live news broadcasts and even the movies became tools for free expression and Michael Moore's Fahrenheit 9/11 is a prevailing example of how a civil act is expressed. Some sectors may say that Moore may be a bit too critical of the Bush Administration when he released the movie Fahrenheit 9/11but others applaud it as a wake up call for what was happening during George W. Bush's administration. In summary, the movie is about what occurred after 9/11 terrorist attacks on US soil and how certain events before and after could be traced to how the Bush Administration has been poorly handling the government. At the height of the 9/11 attacks, the movie showed how George W. Bush was stumped when he first heard the news. He was seen as taking several minutes before he was able to give directions on what courses of action were needed to be taken. This was a disheartening scene because being the president of the most powerful nation in the world; he should have shown more fortitude and decisiveness in dealing with a tremendously important issue.
             Adding insult to injury is when Fahrenheit 9/11 showed that instead of keeping "suspected perpetrators" in custody, they were let go and even escorted out of the country. This had something to do with the immediate family of Osama Bin-Laden being allowed to leave the country. In a criminal, civil or legal case, the suspects or those that have relations to suspects are kept under tight watch because they may be able to help solve the case or shed light on aspects of the case. What happened after the 9/11 incident was totally out of contex...