Jourdon Anderson and Lillian Smith both write with great intent and
purpose. In both writings they use their experiences to speak. Their
voices are heard. Anderson goes from a first hand experience; the instances
referred to in the letter were things that actually happened. On the other
hand, Smith writes in an "allegorical form" to get her point across
(Gardner). In other words, her writing portrays an extended metaphor. In
this case, her character references represent situations that would happen
After reading Jourdan Anderson's letter, one can conclude that he was
definitely voicing his opinion on how he was treated. In the letter to his
former Master, Jourdan begins with sarcasm. In the first paragraph he says,
"I thought the Yankees would have hung you long before this, for harboring
Rebs they found at your house" (Anderson). This kind of information is one
that should be kept a secret, but it seems that Jourdon doesn't care
because at that point, he cannot be punished for it. There are many ways
this letter can be interpreted. A reader can assume that it was for
revenge, and another can view it as closure of his past. Although the main
purpose is not to blackmail his former master, the purpose of this letter
At the beginning of the letter one can be fooled into thinking that
Jourdan wants to go back and work for his old Master because he says, "I
got your letter... promising to do better for me than anybody else can"
(Anderson). When one reads further down, he or she can see that the comment
had a hint of sarcasm. Why would any former slave leave his or her freedom
to work for their former master that mistreated him or her? Why would one
go and work for someone that had pointed a gun at him or her and shot with
the intent of harm? It all concludes that this was more for venting
purposes, because during the time the letter was written, Jourdon was free
...