To write about reality seems simple. All an author must do is portray
day to day life in a work. This should not be so difficult, considering
said author lives day to day life every day. However, one must assess the
differences among each human's day to day lives before assuming to portray
a conceivable "realist" work. By analyzing and contrasting Dostoevsky's
Notes from Underground and Chekhov's The Cherry Orchard one can be
convinced of the complexities of realist writing and the problems realist
writing presents to the writer. Notes from Underground is written from the
perspective of a man overcome with a desire to follow "isms". The Cherry
Orchard depicts a family whose ways of thinking do not change throughout
the entire play, but whose physical reality is changed by the effects of
time. The similarity between these two works is that both contain
characters created by an author. The characters portrayed are not actual
people, and therefore do not contain the complexities of a true human mind.
They contain the thoughts and predispositions of the author who created
them, but lack the well-roundedness of an actual human. Realism can be
described as an attempt to recreate every day life as it truly is in
literature, but reality can not be recreated in its entirety by a partial
author creating unreal characters and unreal circumstances.
Dostoevsky creates an interesting and anonymous character, The
Underground Man, in his work Notes from Underground. This character is
meant to embody the "isms" that so bothered Dostoevsky such as optimism,
atheism, and romantic sentimentalism. This character is supposed to be a
realistic human living a realistic life, however no true human is composed
of all of these ideas. No true human takes on all of the faults of society.
The Underground Man is an outlet for Dostoevsky's distain of humanity, and
therefore the definition of realism must include un...