The argument that I choose was regarding the regulations of exotic animal owners in Ohio. The laxness in the regulations of exotic animal ownership only leads to the possibility of personal injury or death. The current economic situation has put a strain on many individuals financially and some private owners of exotic animals are stressing about the care of the animals. The costs to maintain the health and environment for animals such as the lion, monkey, kangaroo, and bears can be expensive. Several cases have been brought to the public's attention regarding the negligence and difficulty of keeping an exotic animal farm. For example, a man in Zanesville Ohio committed suicide after releasing many wild animals into the community. Terry Thompson had been in trouble with the law on several occasions for the possession of illegal firearms, unsafe environment for the wild animals he cared for, and a substantial debt to the IRS. Even with the government knowing of the complications Mr. Thompson was having he was still able to have a permit to possess the exotic animals. The incident in Zanesville was extreme enough for the state's government to reevaluate the regulations Ohio has in order to keep wild animals for personal use and care. Another example of the consequences of loose regulation pertaining to the maintenance of exotic animals is a situation that occurred in Cleveland Ohio. Sam Mazzola owned wild animals such as wolves, tiger, lions, and coyotes. Mr. Mazzola was permitted to maintain the exotic animal farm even though his permit to display the animals was revoked. On August 20th, 2011 a caretaker on Mazzola's farm was attacked and killed by a bear. The attack possibly might have been prevented if the regulations regarding the care of the animals had been stricter. The loose rules pertaining to the ownership of exotic animals allows for mistreatment of animals, incompetence towards the care of the wild animals, ...