On Monday, August 6,1945, the American B-29 Enola Gay
left its runway carrying a massive weapon that would soon be
responsible for killing 80,000 men, women and children in
Japan. The destructive force, which wiped out many lives and
the entire city of Hiroshima, was the first actual use of a
weapon at the time unheard of by the world, the atomic bomb.
Many questions must be considered to determine whether the
use of atomic power was necessary to distinguish the war,
and if so, was the result of bombing Hiroshima enough? Was
it really necessary to bomb Nagasaki, or was the United
States trying to prove a disturbing and powerful point?
To answer that first we must look at was going on in the
world at the time of the conflict. The U.S. had been
fighting a wars with areas throughout Europe and Asia.
Morale was most likely low, and resources were at the same
level as morale. Obviously the best thing that could have
possibly happened would have been to bring the war to a
quick end with a minimum of allied casualties. The Pottsdam
Conference was around the time of the end of the first war.
Several of the Pacific islands were lost such as China,
Berma, Thailand and Manchua. Harry Truman's decision to drop
the atomic bomb was entirely warranted and was in the best
interest of Americans and the world. With a close and
detailed examination of the events leading to the bombing
and the actual detonation itself, a realization that
the use of the atomic bomb was not just to end the war, but
also to prove the world that the United States was the most
Among the things to consider in the decision to drop
the bomb are the many different aspects that president
Truman had to consider. Truman was thrown into presidency at
a very tumultuous period. When Roosevelt was president,
Truman never knew anything about the war. When Roosevelt
died, Truman's enforced ignorance of...